https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w59jhijyJhw

We watch videos because it is somewhat new information, thought provoking, or at least amusing. But what happens when we don't know enough about that new thing?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Do We Share Oscilloscopes But Buy Textbooks?

Students should have access to their own measurement instruments rather than sharing equipment, especially in universities with higher tuition costs. We need to buy a secondhand iClicker and textbooks for each class, but we have to share the lab's $2000 oscilloscope when a personal one costs just $400. Another point of owning our instruments is that we can grow into it. Even after a semester of lab classes, the oscilloscopes, spectrum analyzers still feel foreign to me. As I am fortunate to own my own equipment, I have seen myself grown into them. My dad bought me an oscilloscope, logic analyzer, and didn't teach me very much how to use it. But as I carry it around with me, I would think about it in the back of my mind and see if it can solve my current problem in my projects. 2 years after I got it, I remembered it, "don't my oscilloscope have a logic analyzer function?". And it was very instrumental in the debugging of my project. Similarly, my $400 Owon 3-in-1 ...
Read more

No means no

One of the popular defenses for piracy is that companies are not making it fair to buy their movies and software, and at the same time, digital goods are virtually infinite after their creation. But another way to look at it is that some things are just not for sale. If I have a journal, I can choose who reads it. I won't let you read it even though it will cost me nothing 1 . I'm not advocating for anything. People do what they want, and I don't have a problem. I just lean more on the latter, and I haven't heard of this perspective in this context before. 1: (assuming there isn't anything incriminating in it)
Read more

Scientific Calculators should shape like a laptop

There are too many keys, too many functions, too many equations, too many constants. We need more inputs and more intuitive formfactor. We need better tools to solve equations "by hand", yet be assisted by software at the same time. The qwerty layout gives too many keys not used for equations. Whiteboards are too one-topic limited. Graphing calculators don't have enough keys, not enough space to categorize the keys, and keys compete for space with the screen. We need a standard keyboard layout for math, and forget the qwerty (in this case). No, Wolfram, Matlab, MathCAD, and python are not sufficient.
Read more